Platform
Solutions
Company
Pricing
Register nowSign in

Replaces · Your outcomes tool

An outcomes tool that can't reach your claims can't win you a rate.

Assessments go out, scores come back, and they live in a system that knows nothing about the episode of care, the level of care, or what any of it was billed at. Which is exactly what a payer conversation requires.

See what it costs

Twenty-four instruments included. Not a separate per-provider subscription.

The real invoice

What it costs, including the parts that never appear on one.

The subscription is the visible line. Everything marked hidden below is paid in staff hours or in revenue that quietly never arrives.

What a standalone outcomes tool costs10 clinicians, illustrative
SubscriptionTypically priced per clinician, per month.
$15–30 / clinician
Scores not on the chartClinicians look in a second system, or results get copied into the note by hand.
~6 hrs / mo
Assembling a payer summaryPulling scores from one system and episodes from another, then reconciling definitions.
2–3 days / quarter
Unmatched pairsIntake and discharge scores that cannot be linked to the same episode are unusable.
Data discarded
Assessments not sentCollection depends on someone remembering, so completion rates drift.
Lost evidence
True monthly cost$150–300 plus the work of making it usable

Illustrative. Subscription ranges are typical rather than quoted, and the hour estimates come from the programs we built this with. Your numbers will differ — the point is which lines are on the invoice and which are not.

Where it breaks

Four seams, all of them at the same boundary.

Scores live away from the chart

A clinician reading a note cannot see the trend without opening another system.

No episode to attach to

Without admission and discharge dates in the same record, baseline-to-latest is a manual join.

Nothing links to the claim

Outcomes cannot be reported against level of care or payer, which is how a payer wants to see them.

The export is a spreadsheet

Producing something a network manager will read means building it by hand every time.

What these tools get right

Instrument libraries, scoring logic and patient-facing delivery are often excellent, and better than what most EHRs bundle. The gap is not measurement. It is that the measurement cannot be joined to the episode or the claim without a person doing it.

Switching

What moving actually involves.

No implementation fee on Solo or Group Practice. Larger migrations with historical data are quoted separately.

Export historical scores

Most tools export instrument results with dates and identifiers.

Step 1
Match to episodes

Scores are attached to the patient and the episode of care they belong to.

Step 2
Set assignment rules

Which instrument, for which program, on what schedule.

Step 3
Run the first program summary

Baseline against latest, with counts, in a payer-facing format.

Step 4

Collection was never the hard part

Everyone collects assessments. Turning them into evidence a payer will act on requires the scores, the episode and the claim to be in the same place.

Bring your current stack to a walkthrough and we will go through it line by line, including the ones we cannot replace.

1invoice, one login

Get started

Start today, or take a look first.

Create an account in minutes. Or book a 30-minute walkthrough.

Register now